Advantages and disadvantages of quick heal antivirus software?
I used many anti-viruses and i suggest you to buy Quick Heal. I'm telling you the advantages and disadvantages of all anti-viruses. Bitdeffender's detection is good but it decrease your internet speed. Bitdeffender is recommend only for high speed users. Kespersky is the worst anti-virus. Virus detection is very bad and it is very risky as it delete the System file also it kill very much computer resource. Norton is a anti virus that only scan for viruses but didn't delete completely as it is mentioned in the official website of symentic(Norton) and the daily update of this anti virus is too big. AVG is a good anti-virus but the main problem is that if are about to download videos from youtube via IDM or DAP, you cant and the daily update of AVG is very big. I recommend this anti-virus only for high speed internet users. Panda has amazing cloud security but the detection is not good at all. Avast has low property of detection and healing. Avira detect very well but cant heal properly. Microsoft Security is now become very popular. The update of Microsoft Security Essential takes low time but it cant heal properly and the scanning of 1.5 gb takes more than 2 hour. I recommend you to buy Quick Heal with amazing scanning,detection and healing property. Update is low and it don't hamper your internet speed. It is my favorite anti virus since i'm using. Quick heal is not so popular but it is the best anti virus. It have also mobile scanner which scan your mobile
We've handpicked 66 related questions for you, similar to «Advantages and disadvantages of quick heal antivirus software?» so you can surely find the answer!